Prepared for Green Tax & Business Advisors by Ryan Rippetoe · July 13, 2026.
This proposal narrows the naming decision for the CFO & advisory platform down to six candidates, each vetted against real, live data — domain and social-handle availability, U.S. trademark records, Google search and AI-assistant recognition, and registrar pricing. Here’s how it’s organized.
How this proposal is organized
Summary
The recommendation and the six-name shortlist at a glance, scored across every check.
The six candidates
Each name has five tabs — Trademark search, Domain history, Marketability (search & AI ownability, social handles, say-and-spell), Pricing (registrar options + defensive domains), and a full marketing-page mockup in that name's own brand color.
Compare & Recommendation
All six side by side on trademark risk, domain history, brand-fit and first-year cost, with the recommendation.
SEO & AEO strategy
How each name positions in Google search and in AI-assistant answers, plus real category-keyword ad costs and Meta / TikTok channel benchmarks.
Next Steps
The action plan once a name is chosen — register the domains, lock the handles, file the trademark, set up email.
Rejected names
The full audit trail — 500+ names screened and the specific reason each was cut.
Reading the scorecard
Every candidate carries a row of status dots across seven checks — domain, trademark, say & spell, handles, search, AI recognition and positioning:
ClearCautionRisk
Every figure is real and dated (July 13, 2026). One caveat: the trademark search is a preliminary automated check, not legal clearance — confirm with counsel before filing.